Tenaris S.A., global manufacturer of steel pipe products in the oil and gas industry, entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), whose terms include payment of $5.4 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (FCPA). The SEC alleges that Tenaris’ employees located in Uzbekistan bribed Uzbekistan government officials during a bidding process in 2006 and 2007 to supply pipelines for transporting oil and natural gas. According to the DPA, the SEC alleges that the company used confidential information gained from the bribed officials to revise its own bids to ensure that Tenaris made the best bid, thereby guaranteeing that the Uzbekistan government awarded the contracts to Tenaris. According to the DPA, Tenaris earned close to $5 million in profits for these contracts.
Tenaris discovered the FCPA violations by Uzbekistan personnel during an in-house worldwide review of its operations and controls. The company immediately self-reported to SEC, permitting the company to participate in the first Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division stated:
The Tenaris foreign bribery scheme was unacceptable and unlawful, but the company’s response demonstrated high levels of corporate accountability and cooperation. . . . Effective enforcement of the securities laws includes acknowledging and providing credit to those who fully and completely support our investigation and who display an exemplary commitment to compliance, cooperation, and remediation.
Under the terms of the DPA, the SEC will not prosecute the company for FCPA violations provided that Tenaris enhances its FCPA and anti-corruption policies and procedures. Specifically, the company must:
• implement due diligence requirements when retaining and paying agents;
• train employees on FCPA and anti-corruption laws
• require certification of compliance; and
• report any complaints, charges or convictions against Tenaris or its employees for any anti-bribery or SEC violations.
Tenaris is incorporated in Luxembourg and its American Depositary Receipts (TS) are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. This is another example of how a non-U.S. company must ensure that it has procedures in place to comply with the U.S.’s FCPA.
Showing posts with label Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Show all posts
Monday, May 23, 2011
Manufacturer of Steel Pipe Products Pays $5.4 Million in Fines for Alleged Violation of FCPA
Posted by
BoskageStaff
at
12:32 PM
0
comments
Follow us on Twitter!
Labels:
anti-bribery,
anti-corruption,
FCPA,
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,
policies and procedures,
Securities and Exchange Commission SEC
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Trade Terms Tuesday

Welcome to Trade Terms Tuesday! Each Tuesday we will share three trade-related terms. In order to reach out to our diverse readership, we will try to provide one for exports, one for imports and one for logistics/transportation. This week, we continue with the F’s.
Force Majeure
Force majeure clauses are found in standard transportation contracts and usually excuse a party who breaches a contract because performance is prevented by an occurrence of an event beyond the party’s control. Generally, force majeure clauses cover earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and war. It is important to remember that force majeure clauses are intended to excuse performance only if the failure to perform could not be avoided by the exercise of due care by the breaching party.
Fallback Method
When imported merchandise cannot be appraised using transaction value, it is to be appraised in accordance with the remaining methods of valuation, applied in sequential order. The alternative bases of appraisement, in order of precedence, are the transaction value of identical merchandise; the transaction value of similar merchandise; deductive value; and computed value. If the value of imported merchandise cannot be determined under these methods, it is to be determined in accordance with section 402(f) of the TAA, known as the “fallback method.” 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(a)(1).The fallback method is also known as derived value, the sixth and final true method of valuation. If all other methods are inappropriate, then derived value must be used. Derived value determines the dutiable value using a combination of the other five methods and allows the value to be "reasonably adjusted to the extent necessary."
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
Administered by the Department of Justice, the FCPA makes it unlawful for any U.S. citizen or business to offer, pay, transfer, promise to pay money or anything of value to any foreign appointed or elected government official, foreign political party or candidate for foreign political office for a corrupt purpose. The FCPA does not prohibit payments made to facilitate a routine government action, one that a foreign official must perform as part of the job such as processing visas or other official documents. . A corrupt payment is one made to influence an official’s discretionary decision. In general, the FCPA prohibits corrupt payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. Individuals and business entities can be criminally liable and punished by both fines and imprisonment. Civil penalties may also be assessed against firms and offices, directors, employees and agents.
Force Majeure
Force majeure clauses are found in standard transportation contracts and usually excuse a party who breaches a contract because performance is prevented by an occurrence of an event beyond the party’s control. Generally, force majeure clauses cover earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and war. It is important to remember that force majeure clauses are intended to excuse performance only if the failure to perform could not be avoided by the exercise of due care by the breaching party.
Fallback Method
When imported merchandise cannot be appraised using transaction value, it is to be appraised in accordance with the remaining methods of valuation, applied in sequential order. The alternative bases of appraisement, in order of precedence, are the transaction value of identical merchandise; the transaction value of similar merchandise; deductive value; and computed value. If the value of imported merchandise cannot be determined under these methods, it is to be determined in accordance with section 402(f) of the TAA, known as the “fallback method.” 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(a)(1).The fallback method is also known as derived value, the sixth and final true method of valuation. If all other methods are inappropriate, then derived value must be used. Derived value determines the dutiable value using a combination of the other five methods and allows the value to be "reasonably adjusted to the extent necessary."
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
Administered by the Department of Justice, the FCPA makes it unlawful for any U.S. citizen or business to offer, pay, transfer, promise to pay money or anything of value to any foreign appointed or elected government official, foreign political party or candidate for foreign political office for a corrupt purpose. The FCPA does not prohibit payments made to facilitate a routine government action, one that a foreign official must perform as part of the job such as processing visas or other official documents. . A corrupt payment is one made to influence an official’s discretionary decision. In general, the FCPA prohibits corrupt payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. Individuals and business entities can be criminally liable and punished by both fines and imprisonment. Civil penalties may also be assessed against firms and offices, directors, employees and agents.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Should You Take Your Foreign Supplier to Dinner?
The dilemma of whether to take foreign suppliers to dinner is one that is not easily answered. It appears that the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is waking up from a little nap. Ok, the FCPA has been around since 1977 and it has not actually been sleeping, but we are seeing more about it in the news. The Justice Department reports approximately 120 companies are currently under investigation. The FCPA came out of hibernation shortly after the scandal at Enron and the introduction of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (SOX). The FCPA prohibits improper payments to influence foreign officials who have the power to affect a company's business. Officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have been aggressively pursuing more and more cases and obtaining results that include criminal fines, prison terms for individuals, and the return of monies obtained through illegal means. Because of the increased scrutiny by both the government and the press, many companies have placed more efforts on anti-corruption efforts.
The FCPA prohibits corrupt payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. The provisions of the FCPA make it unlawful for a U.S. person to make a corrupt payment to a foreign official for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person. The provisions also apply to foreign firms and persons who take any act in furtherance of such a corrupt payment while in the United States. The purpose of the FCPA is to eliminate bribery of foreign officials, restore the public confidence in the integrity of American business, and change the way American firms do business.
Because of SEC investigations in the mid-1970's, over 400 U.S. companies admitted making questionable or illegal payments to foreign government officials, politicians, and political parties. Some of the payments were bribes of high foreign officials to secure some favorable action by a foreign government. Others were labeled as facilitating payments that were made to ensure that government employees performed their required duties.
It is important to understand the difference between a bribe and a facilitation fee. A bribe is the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties. A facilitation fee or payment is one that is paid for routine governmental actions. The fee is paid to ensure that the government employees actually perform the task that they are legally obligated to perform. The fees may also be paid to expedite the process. Some of these fees include:
· obtaining permits, licenses, or other official documents;
· processing governmental papers, such as visas
· providing police protection,
· mail pick-up and delivery;
· providing phone service, power and water supply,
· loading and unloading cargo.
The bottom line is that a bribe could cost your company millions of dollars in penalties and send someone to jail and a facilitation fee will not.
Who is subject to the FCPA?
The FCPA applies to any individual, firm, officer, director, employee, or agent of a firm and any stockholder acting on behalf of a firm. Individuals and firms may also be penalized if they order, authorize, or assist someone else to violate the anti-bribery provisions or if they conspire to violate those provisions. U.S. parent corporations may be held liable for the acts of foreign subsidiaries where they authorized, directed, or controlled the activity in question, as can U.S. citizens or residents, themselves "domestic concerns," who were employed by or acting on behalf of such foreign-incorporated subsidiaries. The FCPA also prohibits corrupt payments through intermediaries. It is unlawful to make a payment to a third party, while knowing that all or a portion of the payment will go directly or indirectly to a foreign official. Intermediaries may include joint venture partners or agents.
The person making or authorizing the payment must have a corrupt intent, and the payment must be intended to induce the recipient to misuse his official position to direct business wrongfully or to provide to the payer or to any other person any improper advantage, or to induce a foreign official to use his or her influence improperly to affect or influence any act or decision.
The payment may be the actual payment, promising to pay, authorizing to pay or offering money or anything of value, including gifts or trips. The FCPA applies to payments to any public official, regardless of rank or position. The FCPA focuses on the purpose of the payment instead of the particular duties of the official receiving the payment, offer, or promise of payment. The FCPA prohibits payments made in order to assist the firm in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person. The business to be obtained or retained does not need to be with a foreign government or foreign government instrumentality.
Best Practices
Is someone at your company violating the FCPA? How would you know? It is not likely that your co-worker is going to jump up and shout the he is bribing the customs officials in Brazil. In order to help companies maintain compliance with the FCPA, they should consider the following actions.
The FCPA prohibits corrupt payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. The provisions of the FCPA make it unlawful for a U.S. person to make a corrupt payment to a foreign official for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person. The provisions also apply to foreign firms and persons who take any act in furtherance of such a corrupt payment while in the United States. The purpose of the FCPA is to eliminate bribery of foreign officials, restore the public confidence in the integrity of American business, and change the way American firms do business.
Because of SEC investigations in the mid-1970's, over 400 U.S. companies admitted making questionable or illegal payments to foreign government officials, politicians, and political parties. Some of the payments were bribes of high foreign officials to secure some favorable action by a foreign government. Others were labeled as facilitating payments that were made to ensure that government employees performed their required duties.
It is important to understand the difference between a bribe and a facilitation fee. A bribe is the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties. A facilitation fee or payment is one that is paid for routine governmental actions. The fee is paid to ensure that the government employees actually perform the task that they are legally obligated to perform. The fees may also be paid to expedite the process. Some of these fees include:
· obtaining permits, licenses, or other official documents;
· processing governmental papers, such as visas
· providing police protection,
· mail pick-up and delivery;
· providing phone service, power and water supply,
· loading and unloading cargo.
The bottom line is that a bribe could cost your company millions of dollars in penalties and send someone to jail and a facilitation fee will not.
Who is subject to the FCPA?
The FCPA applies to any individual, firm, officer, director, employee, or agent of a firm and any stockholder acting on behalf of a firm. Individuals and firms may also be penalized if they order, authorize, or assist someone else to violate the anti-bribery provisions or if they conspire to violate those provisions. U.S. parent corporations may be held liable for the acts of foreign subsidiaries where they authorized, directed, or controlled the activity in question, as can U.S. citizens or residents, themselves "domestic concerns," who were employed by or acting on behalf of such foreign-incorporated subsidiaries. The FCPA also prohibits corrupt payments through intermediaries. It is unlawful to make a payment to a third party, while knowing that all or a portion of the payment will go directly or indirectly to a foreign official. Intermediaries may include joint venture partners or agents.
The person making or authorizing the payment must have a corrupt intent, and the payment must be intended to induce the recipient to misuse his official position to direct business wrongfully or to provide to the payer or to any other person any improper advantage, or to induce a foreign official to use his or her influence improperly to affect or influence any act or decision.
The payment may be the actual payment, promising to pay, authorizing to pay or offering money or anything of value, including gifts or trips. The FCPA applies to payments to any public official, regardless of rank or position. The FCPA focuses on the purpose of the payment instead of the particular duties of the official receiving the payment, offer, or promise of payment. The FCPA prohibits payments made in order to assist the firm in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person. The business to be obtained or retained does not need to be with a foreign government or foreign government instrumentality.
Best Practices
Is someone at your company violating the FCPA? How would you know? It is not likely that your co-worker is going to jump up and shout the he is bribing the customs officials in Brazil. In order to help companies maintain compliance with the FCPA, they should consider the following actions.
- Develop a policy consistent with the FCPA.
- Publish the policy in the employee manuals and on the company’s website.
- Provide clear guidelines for gifts, meals, entertainment, travel, donations and lobbying.
- Provide training for all employees and refresher training as needed.
- Establish and enforce similar guidelines for foreign branches, subsidiaries, etc.
- Use due diligence when selecting business partners that act as intermediaries.
- Establish a compliance monitoring program.
- Disclose any violations to the DOJ.
Before taking that foreign supplier to a fancy dinner or slipping some cash under the table, consider what that dinner might actually cost you and your company. In December 2008, a fine of $800 million was imposed on a large multinational company. Not only could your company incur a hefty penalty payable to the U.S. government, but also the cost of rectifying internal corruption could exceed the amounts paid in penalties.
Posted by
Karin
at
10:06 AM
0
comments
Follow us on Twitter!
Labels:
FCPA,
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)