Ahoy mateys! The first two days have been a great learning experience at the ICPA Conference in Orlando. As expected, the speakers are fantastic. Since the Wizard learns something at each session, it seemed like a good day to share a little of it with our faithful readers who are not at the conference with us. Unfortunately, the Wizard cannot attend all five sessions at one time, so only a small portion of the news will appear here for now.
Third Party Violations
This session started with three questions –
1. What did you know?
2. When did you know it?
3. What did you do about it?
Knowledge is key! Burying your head in the sand won’t make it go away! The session also included helpful hints on how to prevent third party violations through training, reviewing terms and conditions and performing end-use/end-user checks.
Training Employees on Export Control
Natalia Shehadeh delivered a dynamic presentation in which she outlined a winning approach to implementing a comprehensive training program for a large multinational company with over 100 locations all over the world. She reminded the audience that it’s important to sell compliance – get buy-in and support from executive management as well as those who have responsibilities in the export process. Her approach tackles the locations with the highest risk first and includes face-to-face training with these locations. As the program grows, a variety of methods will be employed to get the message across.
Understanding Incoterms
Always a favorite for attendees, Frank Reynolds told the crowd that he couldn’t say much about the new Incoterms 2010 because they weren’t finalized and his counterparts would do him serious bodily harm if he told us too much. In a nutshell, the new Incoterms will become effective on 1/1/11, will contain fewer than the 13 terms currently used plus one new term. The new Incoterms is a major revision and it is hoped that they will be adopted for domestic transactions. After the big news, Mr. Reynolds made it clear that the Incoterms were not law and did not convey ownership. He then went on to explain in detail the meaning of all 13 terms.
Does anyone know how many languages the Incoterms are printed in?
Export Control Violations
Attorneys from Holland & Hart provided a great roadmap for handling export violations. Of course it all starts with the identification of a possible violation. How a company handles these violations could affect the amount of penalties paid. Companies should be careful to conduct interviews in which the employees understand the “civil miranda” (the company doesn’t represent the employee) along with considering cultural differences and maintaining proper records of the interviews. Another key step in the process is to make sure all documents related to the transaction are maintained.
Case Studies and Consequences in Trade Compliance
This session started out with a detailed review of the former University of Tennessee professor who was convicted of multiple export violations and sentenced to 4 years in jail. Colleges and universities need to take notice of the U.T. case as this one is only the tip of the iceberg. This case likely prompted several dozen disclosures that were filed by institutions of higher education. This case was followed by a detailed explanation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). This portion of the presentation provided information about prohibited payments, exceptions to the rule and some best practices for keeping your company out of trouble.
Stay tuned! We’ll be back at the end of the week with some additional tidbits from the conference!
Showing posts with label Incoterms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Incoterms. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Monday, March 31, 2008
The Future of Incoterms
Developed by the International Chamber of Commerce, Incoterms consist of 13 standard trade definitions used in international sales contracts. As part of the contract between the buyer and seller, Incoterms define the responsibilities of the buyer and seller for delivery of goods, and determine how costs and risks are allocated to the parties. By using Incoterms, a buyer and seller have a standard set of guidelines, which determine the responsibilities of each party, reducing the possibility of costly misunderstandings and disputes. Incoterms are not part of the contract for transportation; however, the terms define which party is responsible for arranging transportation, delivery and international insurance.The first version of the Incoterms was introduced by the ICC in 1936. To keep up with changes in international trade, the Incoterms have been updated six times, most recently in 2000. Changes to the 2010 edition are now being discussed by the ICC Commercial Law & Practice Committee. One change includes the removal of the year from the title. Currently, the inclusion of the year implies that a new edition would not be released for ten years. Incoterms could be revised at any time, thus a neutral title should help alleviate these assumptions.
What should be changed, added or deleted during these revision discussions? One idea suggests clarification for certain terms that are often misunderstood and misused. Another option would be to remove terms that are not frequently used. With the increased use of the Internet as a means to transact business, is it possible that a new term or terms could be created to apply strictly to Internet contracts? In addition, there were some suggestions that were not implements for the 2000 edition that might be more practical now. Another issue the committee must consider is the changes in relationships and contracts as result of cargo security requirements. It’s still early, but we should be prepared to learn a few new terms and say goodbye to some old ones.
What should be changed, added or deleted during these revision discussions? One idea suggests clarification for certain terms that are often misunderstood and misused. Another option would be to remove terms that are not frequently used. With the increased use of the Internet as a means to transact business, is it possible that a new term or terms could be created to apply strictly to Internet contracts? In addition, there were some suggestions that were not implements for the 2000 edition that might be more practical now. Another issue the committee must consider is the changes in relationships and contracts as result of cargo security requirements. It’s still early, but we should be prepared to learn a few new terms and say goodbye to some old ones.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)